The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

Rule 18: Discuss the Work

31 August, 2015 by James Lawther 5 Comments

There are two types of conversations about work:

The first is a Friday evening conversation.  It is best held at about 5pm in the pub just around the corner from the office in hushed tones.

The first conversation discusses who:

  • Who screwed up
  • Who is on the way up
  • Who is on the way out
  • And — in my younger years — who is sleeping with whom

This type of conversation is very satisfying.  There is nothing like a little character assassination to round off your week.  Unfortunately it never goes anywhere and does precisely nothing to improve performance.

The second conversation is about what not who:

The conversation asks:

  • What is happening?
  • Why is it happening?
  • What did we learn?
  • What are we going to do next?

This type of conversation is nowhere near as much fun, but it is a lot more rewarding. You just have to follow a couple of guidelines:

Conversational guidelines

  • Hold the meeting in the workplace if you can, not a conference room.  It will give context and cues
  • Involve the same people — not too many
  • Use a standing agenda
  • Always discuss the same measures (if you keep changing them you will never get better)
  • Make everything visual.  Put the agenda, performance, issues and actions up on a wall.  Make it clear
  • Be honest about issues, talk about the evidence, do not offer excuses or cast blame
  • Don’t problem solve, do that later, keep the session short and punchy.
  • Create action.  Who is going to do what?
  • Check the actions, did you do what you said you would, if not, why not?  Should the action change?
  • Repeat the conversation religiously  – once per day, once per week, once per month.  Make the gap long enough for the actions to have happened but short enough to keep on-top of the issues
  • Hold the conversation in the same place at the same time, then no one can forget

You will know the conversation is not going well if:

  • People routinely turn up late.  They are voting with their feet
  • People turn up unprepared.  They aren’t taking it seriously
  • There is lots of good news and few problems.  People are scared to tell the truth
  • The energy is low.  People are positioning and telling tales, not getting to the point and addressing it
  • Issues aren’t being resolved.  Why attend a meeting that is simply a talking shop?

Most important of all…

Remember that this is a conversation about what not who.  “Who caused that?” and “What caused that?” might sound the same, but the responses you will get are a million miles apart.

The who is always best talked about in the pub.

Rule 18: Discuss the work

If you enjoyed this post click here to have the next delivered straight to your inbox

Read another opinion

Image by Hamed Parham

Filed Under: Blog, Employee Engagement Tagged With: bitching and moaning, blame, communication, gemba, key performance indicators, plan do check act, stand up meetings

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. Annette Franz says

    1 September, 2015 at 5:44 am

    Unfortunately, I believer type #1 happens more often than type #2.

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      27 September, 2015 at 11:56 am

      I’m probably a little guilty of that myself Annette

      Reply
  2. Adrian Swinscoe says

    13 September, 2015 at 1:13 pm

    Hi James,
    I wonder how much discussion went into Toyota’s new system:

    http://dailykanban.com/2015/03/toyotas-tnga-tps-2-0/

    I assume discussion will be an ongoing and integral part of the process too.

    Adrian

    Reply
  3. James Lawther says

    27 September, 2015 at 11:58 am

    Thanks for the link Adrian, right up my street

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. The Rules of the Workplace says:
    10 November, 2017 at 5:22 pm

    […] Discuss the work […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Should You Punish Mistakes?

  • Regression to The Mean

  • Best-of-Breed

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in