The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

Customers Despise Centres of Excellence

7 April, 2012 by James Lawther 5 Comments

Imagine you make pizzas for a living

You are the master baker

You have an army of under bakers at your disposal.  They run the best fleet of pizza ovens in the country, no sooner are they given an uncooked pizza than it is baked to perfection.  You run a pizza baking “centre of excellence”

But the delivery and dispatch department are giving you grief, they say your pizzas are always late.  They don’t understand.  It isn’t your fault and it isn’t fair.  The real problem is the cheese jockeys and the dough boys, let alone the fool who makes the tomato sauce

And it isn’t your job to make tomato sauce.  You are not paid to make tomato sauce.  Tomato sauce is non of your business

Now you have a choice.  Spend the rest of your life in crisis meetings with distribution, blaming other people and ducking the issue.  Or take some accountability for the situation and start chopping and stirring

Incidentally, if the delivery is late your customers don’t care if it was the chef or the scooter boy at fault

Of course this is purely apocryphal story, I bet it doesn’t happen where you work

Chopping Tomatoes

Read another opinion

Image by abyssalmissile

Filed Under: Blog, Process Improvement Tagged With: accountability, point optimisation

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. maz iqbal says

    8 April, 2012 at 9:56 am

    Hello James

    Excellent. I believe Goldratt pointed out that the system is only as strong as its weakest subsystem. He used the chain to illustrate the concept: the chain is only as strong as the weakest link.

    Leaders stand up and take responsibility for that which requires responsibility and accountability. And that may or may not be under their formal area of responsbility / control. That is why these people are being called leaders – they are taking the lead, being proactive, taking ownership. And you as you full well know there is a huge leadership void in many organisations.

    The final thought that occurs to me is that being a centre of excellence whilst being surrounded by centres of not excellence is just wasteful. It is like putting a first rate engine into a car that will allow the car to go at speeds of 200 mph and last for say 500,000 miles when the rest of the car can only tolerate a car that drives only as fast as 100mph and where the car body will fall apart after 200,000 miles. Pointless and wasteful!

    Yet, this stuff, this practice is prevalent in functionally, designed and managed organisations – that means ALL organisations, right?

    Maz

    Reply
  2. Adrian Swinscoe says

    9 April, 2012 at 9:27 am

    Hi James,
    In the Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith talked about the division of labour and how it could be applied to boost productivity and production, particularly in a pin factory example he used. However, nowhere in his example did he include a division of responsibility as part of the division of labour.

    I wonder who’s responsible for that reduction and can we separate the two?

    Adrian

    Reply
  3. James Lawther says

    11 April, 2012 at 8:26 am

    Thank you for your comments, I’d always wondered about Adam Smith’s pin factory and the division of labour, it seems to cause so many issues. Your point about the division of responsibility is a very interesting one

    JL

    Reply
  4. Wesley Connell says

    1 May, 2012 at 3:10 pm

    My question is how does one center of excellence pop up within a non-optimal setting? I would see this issue as a failure of management to understand the entire value stream specifically from a customer point of view. As management saw the impressive results from the baking center, maybe they could have pulled top performers out of the area and had them evaluate and improve the areas that were lacking. This would be similar to how companies like Toyota take the best performers from an area and move them to lacking areas. It is not meant to be a punishment (as many places would see it) to be moved from the best to worst areas, but an opportunity to use creativity and the beginners mind to look at change from a new perspective.

    I think this idea is one aspect that is missed by managers and workers alike. If there was an understood “promotion” to go from a “good” job to a “bad” job with the understanding that its up to you to improve it, and that management understood the move and backed the changes, I see a shift in mindset about the value of the entire value stream and not just your individual area.

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      5 May, 2012 at 11:43 am

      Thanks for your comment Wes, I think you are right it is a “failure of management to understand the entire value stream”, but then by their very existence isn’t that what centres of excellence show? There is nobody quite as blind as those who won’t see.

      James

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Circles of Influence: Do You Want Your Team Flexing Their’s?

  • Should You Punish Mistakes?

  • Sex and Soap Powder, Trial and Error

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in