The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

Do You Need Good Managers?

29 March, 2018 by James Lawther 1 Comment

A nice assertion

“Teams who rate their manager highly do better”. I don’t have any data that proves it, but it sounds like common sense. I am, however, always a little wary of common sense, so lets refine that assertion and go with something more concrete.

A grounded assertion

“People leave bad managers”. According to a Gallup survey of over 7,000 people the number one reason for leaving a job is a bad manager. Staff turnover is expensive, both in terms of recruitment costs and lost knowledge.

Yes, you need good managers.

What makes a good manager?

Google decided to find out. They have a department called “people analytics” who trawled through thousands of documents to see what they could discover. They looked at performance reviews, 360 degree feedback, hiring notes and productivity assessments.

Eventually the analysts came back with a list of 8 features of a good boss. They are, in order of importance:

  1. They’re good coaches.
  2. They empower their team and don’t micro-manage.
  3. They express interest in their team members’ success and personal well-being.
  4. They’re productive and results oriented.
  5. They’re good communicators and they listen to the team.
  6. They help employees with career development.
  7. They have a clear vision and strategy for the team.
  8. They have key technical skills that help them advise the team.

Tell me something I don’t know

It is an interesting but not terribly startling list.

The only thought-provoking point is that the “hard” capabilities of strategy and technical skills are at the bottom. Employees clearly like space to make their own decisions and not managers telling them what to do.

Other than that it is the same list that any H.R. professional could trot out over a cup of tea.

The list misses a big point

If the analysis was robust (and I assume it was) Google had to know who their good and bad managers were. The only way they could have done that is by collecting honest (and therefore presumably anonymous) feedback from all of their staff about all of their managers.

How many organisations routinely collect that information?

How many H.R. departments can hand on heart say they have the data that shows who their good managers are. I don’t mean employee satisfaction surveys or assessments from the top. I mean cold hard anonymous staff feedback.

I have worked for lots of organisations who are very keen on performance managing their staff from above. But vanishingly few who performance manage their managers from below.

If you want good managers…

The first step is to find out if you have any, and the only people who can tell you are your staff.

Perhaps you could ask.

If you enjoyed this post click here to receive the next

Good Manager

Read another opinion

Image by 红岗 郑

Filed Under: Blog, Employee Engagement Tagged With: management style, performance management

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. Emma Robbins says

    3 April, 2018 at 10:29 am

    Great article here.

    We have found that using our 360 degree feedback for a period of time, companies have discovered the characteristics of the managers that are proving to be the most productive in their organisation.

    Using this data, they have aligned their development plans to these particular skill sets and over time have been able to visibly improve on productivity.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Circles of Influence: Do You Want Your Team Flexing Their’s?

  • Should You Punish Mistakes?

  • Sex and Soap Powder, Trial and Error

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in