The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

What Type of Boss are You?

18 January, 2015 by James Lawther 6 Comments

In most businesses there are two types of bosses (maybe more):

Some are managerial

Managers think strategically, they work out exactly where they want to go and then create plans to get them there, as effectively as possible.  They plan, organise and execute.

Managers…

  1. Have big plans
  2. Search out resources
  3. Exploit and optimise
  4. Work out the expected return
  5. Avoid failure
  6. Reward success
  7. Worry about what is
  8. Manage their superiors

Managers are rational

If you can predict the future you can control it

Others are entrepreneurial

Entrepreneurs think tactically, they know roughly which direction they want to go and then take every opportunity they see that steers them in that general direction.  They scan, try and do.

Entrepreneurs…

  1. Carry out small actions
  2. Use what they have
  3. Experiment and explore
  4. Know exactly how much they can afford to lose
  5. Learn from failure
  6. Reward action
  7. Worry about what could be
  8. Defy their superiors

Entrepreneurs are just plain odd

If you can create the future you don’t need to control it

These people don’t really see eye to eye

The managerial see themselves as strategic thinkers and dismiss entrepreneurs as just tactical.  Whilst the entrepreneurial think the managers are… well… just plain dull.

Of course neither line of thought has a moratorium on being right.  Maybe they would work well together.

What type of boss are you?

If you enjoyed this post click here to have the next delivered to your inbox

Manager or Entrepreneur

Read another opinion

Image by stormsworld

Filed Under: Blog, Wild Cards Tagged With: innovation, learning, management style, planning

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. Annette Franz says

    19 January, 2015 at 4:50 am

    James,

    I like your classifications… but what if they weren’t mutually exclusive? What if we could have a two-for-one? What if someone had the characteristics of both? Is that possible?

    Annette :-)

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      25 January, 2015 at 8:04 pm

      I’m sure it is Annette, but I do love a good stereotype. I should be writing for the tabloids

      James

      Reply
  2. Adrian Swinscoe says

    24 January, 2015 at 6:54 pm

    Hi James,
    I’m not sure that I agree with your definition of entrepreneurs being tactical and not strategic. Consider some of the great business builders of recent years: Dyson, Branson, Bezos etc etc. I’m pretty sure if you asked each of them they wouldn’t describe themselves as tactical but would describe themselves as strategic given they set out to change the status quo.

    Adrian

    Reply
  3. James Lawther says

    25 January, 2015 at 8:05 pm

    A very good point Adrian,I think my point is about approach and the willingness to try things out, which is often lacking in large organisations.

    Reply
    • Adrian Swinscoe says

      31 January, 2015 at 1:43 pm

      Aha! The willingness to take risks and try new things. A rare commodity indeed.

      Reply
  4. maz iqbal says

    1 February, 2015 at 3:51 pm

    Hello James,

    When I was younger I was firmly in the managerial camp. Later, my eyes were opened (due to working in smaller companies where creative activity was the business of the business) and fell into the entrepreneurial camp. Nowadays, I like to think that I an in a position to fuse both worlds: strategy and experimentation/tinkering. Or strategic tinkering/experimentation.

    Clearly, being a human-being means that vanity is the ground of my existence. So it is quite likely that I am kidding myself. And am actually incompetent at both.

    At your service | with my love
    maz

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Circles of Influence: Do You Want Your Team Flexing Their’s?

  • Should You Punish Mistakes?

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Solutioneering

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in