The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

The Simple Restructuring Rule

19 July, 2013 by James Lawther 4 Comments

There are two big predators in the sea

Sharks and Dolphins

They came from very different starting points:

  • A shark is a fish
  • A dolphin is a mammal
  • A shark has gills
  • A dolphin has lungs
  • A shark is cold-blooded
  • A dolphin is warm-blooded
  • A shark lays eggs
  • A dolphin has live young

Biologically they would struggle to be more different

But they evolved

They have both developed to fulfill the same role

  • They both have sharp teeth
  • They both have streamlined bodies
  • They both have powerful musculature
  • They are both killers

The lesson is simple:

It doesn’t matter where you start only where you finish

There are two ways to organise your business

Centralise or decentralise

They are very different propositions:

  • Centralisation allows specialisation
  • Decentralisation brings you close to the customer
  • Centralisation allows control
  • Decentralisation allows empowerment
  • Centralisation provides clarity
  • Decentralisation provides flexibility

Intellectually they would struggle to be more different

But we never move on

In the great centralisation versus decentralisation debate we just keep reorganizing and flipping from one model to the next.  It takes us nowhere

The lesson is the same

If we can’t agree where the starting line is, how do we ever expect to finish?

Please, decide and move on

Enjoy this post?  Click here for updates

Shark or Dolphin

Read another opinion

Image by mriggen

Filed Under: Blog, Process Improvement Tagged With: continuous improvement, organisation, reorganisation, silo management

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. Adrian Swinscoe says

    20 July, 2013 at 10:08 am

    Hi James,
    Doesn’t ‘deciding’ require being honest with ourselves and others of what we are, what we’ve done and where we come from?

    That, it would appear, seems to be hard for many.

    Maybe ‘honesty’ and ‘deciding’ could become competitive advantages.

    Adrian

    Reply
  2. maz iqbal says

    20 July, 2013 at 11:54 am

    Hello James

    It occurs to me that the question of centralisation and decentralisation is one that has everything to do with the being of those in power.

    If the person in power is one whose being is fearful of disorder and distrustful of his fellows then he will find himself attracted and eventually addicted to order. Order requires control and so this kind of person will seek to control through centralisation. This kind of person is most comfortable in authority relationships where the rules of the game are clear and consistently applied. These kind of people tend to be professional managers.

    If on the other hand you have a person who has had positive experience with the variety-flexibility-mystery of the world and come to be trusting of his fellows then you have a person who will favour decentralisation. For this kind of person, centralisation will occur as being unnecessary. These kind of people are the ones that tend to be creative. They tend to be the ones that set up new businesses, undertake new ventures. These kind of people tend to have a high confidence in themselves and their ability to dance with life.

    So it occurs to me that when you have changes in the Tops you are likely to have swings between centralisation and decentralisation.

    At your service
    maz

    Reply
  3. Bob says

    23 July, 2013 at 9:10 am

    Can you have both?

    What organizations do you know of that have managed to combine centralization – of agreeing standards and values and principles? – with decentralization – of control over responding to events, and handling the day to day work?

    To me this would imply a climate of trust and an absence of fear.

    Thank you for the post, made me think.

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      24 July, 2013 at 5:08 am

      I’m sure you can Bob, and maybe that is a very good way to set out your stall.

      I guess though that most organisations would busily argue about who should own “the standard” or “responding to events” and consequently sink into a long and drawn out argument about roles and responsibilities, power and accountability.

      Which would do nothing for the climate of trust and fear which you (and I) want.

      Thanks very much for your comment

      James

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Should You Punish Mistakes?

  • Regression to The Mean

  • Brilliance Alone Won’t Take You Far

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in