The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

Are You Cruel to Your Children?

15 May, 2013 by James Lawther 6 Comments

I tore into my 10 year-old-daughter yesterday.

It wasn’t a half-baked telling off.

It was a full on balling out.

I was so angry, I must have screamed at her for 10 minutes.

The poor little mite was in floods of tears by the time I finished.  She sobbed for half an hour.

Why was I so angry?

She stepped into the road without looking.

It is my worst nightmare that my children are killed by some fool using a mobile phone instead of watching the road.

We hear horror stories about children being abducted, but if anything happens to mine it won’t be a kidnapping, it will be a man in a white van not watching the road.

It makes me shudder to even think about it.

Ripping into her didn’t help

When I finally calmed down and the fear and frustration had abated I said to her

“Don’t you know how to cross the road?”

she replied:

“No, not really”

This isn’t the first time I have put the fear of God into her, but screaming at her hasn’t told her what to do.  I assumed she had been taught at school, but apparently not.

She was just following me down the street.

How is she supposed to know how to cross the road if I have never really shown her?

It’s not just my daughter

How many times have you put up posters telling people that “The Customer is King” or “Safety Matters” then balled out your staff and put them on performance improvement plans without ever giving them the method, tools and training to do the right thing?

Will they know what to do better next time?

A goal without a method is cruel – W.Edwards Deming

If you enjoyed this post click here for updates

Read another opinion

Image by zeeweez

 

Filed Under: Blog, Process Improvement Tagged With: capability, confidence, management style, targets, training, video, W. Edwards Deming

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. Mark H. Davis says

    16 May, 2013 at 9:05 pm

    James, you are a brave soul. If I were to publicly admit to a 10-minute “balling out” of my daughter, I would be typing my next blog on a mid-90s PC in a grimy jail cell. We are emasculated parents here in the US, where the tail wags the dog and the dog can whimper nary a protest. That being said, nice post and I love the Deming quote. I must use that in my next DMAIC teaching.

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      17 May, 2013 at 4:43 am

      I need to watch that

      Balling Out (UK slang) ~ To tell off, to publicly humiliate, to scream and shout at.

      Not to be confused with

      Ballin Out (US slang) ~ To spend exorbitant amounts of money. Usually with the confines of a one ridiculously drunken evening. Often accompanied by sluts, assorted bling, and no regard for any type of human reason.

      Hope that clears it up.

      James

      Reply
  2. Adrian Swinscoe says

    18 May, 2013 at 1:20 pm

    Hi James,
    I was facilitating at an away day yesterday and one thing came up that applies here: Assumptions often get us and others into trouble.

    I’m glad your daughter is safe and hope that you have calmed down. :)

    Adrian

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      19 May, 2013 at 8:01 am

      Only just calmed down, I think it is a father daughter thing

      Reply
  3. maz iqbal says

    18 May, 2013 at 2:27 pm

    Hello James

    Great way to point at that which needs attention. As I read your story, I hear a strong need to ensure that safety of your daughter. This need triggers inappropriate behaviour because your button gets pressed, the amygdala gets highjacked, you act instantly. When you have calmed down then the reflective part of you considers the situation and asks intelligent questions. And you get the insight: aha, I assumed, my assumptions is incorrect, then you act to supply that which is missing.

    What I find fascinating is that we are brought up in cultures that put agency, rationality and free will at the centre of what is so. Which means EVERYTHING gets attributed to a human being. The further assumption, is that everything is predictable if only one had used one’s reason to figure stuff out. Therefore, when you and I do not get what we want – perfection – then we automatically attribute agency, blame, and criticise. This then ruptures relationships and generates self-protective behaviour from those whose self-esteem is dented.

    One of the wisest sayings i have heard goes like this: a person’s behaviour is direct function of the way that shows up for him/her. Which means that given how the situation shows up for the person he/she could not have done anything else. Now if you stand in this space and look/act on the world then a whole new world opens up. You start to ask questions: how would the situation/world have to show up for X for him/her to do Y? And then you check with X. Just like you did with your daughter.

    Imagine what kind of world we would co-create if we operate from this stand: every single person is doing what shows up has the right action course of action given how the world/situation shows up for him? So let’s listen first, understand, build a relationship, create an opening to inform/educate, then inform/educate.

    All the best
    Maz

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      19 May, 2013 at 8:04 am

      Absolutely Maz, I love your point:

      A person’s behaviour is direct function of the way that shows up for him. Which means that given how the situation shows up for the person he could not have done anything else

      A reaction often has more to do with the person who reacted than the person who provoked it in the first place.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Regression to The Mean

  • Glory Lasts Forever

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Should You Punish Mistakes?

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in