The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

100% Utilisation Isn’t a Good Idea

25 April, 2015 by James Lawther 6 Comments

Improving Efficiency

Your job as a manager is to deliver the best service at the lowest cost. Cost and service are all that ever worries the guys upstairs. Conventional wisdom is that the easiest way to do that is to keep your staff fully occupied. Ensure they are always working as fast as possible without any downtime. 100% utilisation is the goal.

If conventional wisdom isn’t telling you to do that, then I am pretty sure your boss is.

If you fully utilise your staff, then:

  • You make sure your team don’t slack off
  • You minimise your costs
  • You show strong management
  • You get the boss off your back.

Or so the logic goes.

Let Them Slack Off.

Far be it for me to challenge conventional wisdom, but scheduling your staff at 100% occupancy is foolish. Putting 10 or 20% slack in the system is a far more sensible approach.

If your staff is under-utilised, then:

  • You can absorb spikes in demand.
  • You won’t get backlogs and chase calls.
  • You won’t spend all your time re-prioritising tasks.
  • Your staff can spend their downtime improving their work, using their initiative

By improving your work, you will create more space and more slack. Then you can bring work in

That way, you will deliver the best service at the lowest cost, which is where we came in.

Three Small Problems

There are three issues you need to overcome to reach nirvana:

1. You must create space

You can’t start the virtuous spiral without it, and it isn’t easy to create space if you are already 100% utilised. It sounds insoluble, but it isn’t so hard. Not all tasks are equal; some of what you do is less valuable than the rest. Stop doing the unimportant stuff. Say no.

2. You need to trust your staff not to slack off

Either change the people to some you can trust, or — more likely — change the manager to someone more trusting.

3. Your boss won’t like it

Chances are he will, particularly when he sees the results. But if he doesn’t, do it anyway and don’t tell him. What he doesn’t know won’t hurt him.

Create Some Space

Your staff, boss and customers will thank you for it. And if your boss insists on 100% utilisation, then find another job. Do you want to work somewhere like that?

If you enjoyed this post, click here to have the next delivered straight to your inbox.

100% Occupancy

Read another opinion

Image by Mad Wraith

Filed Under: Blog, Employee Engagement Tagged With: backlog, best practice, employee performance measures, key performance indicators, short term thinking, staff utilisation

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. Annette Franz says

    26 April, 2015 at 3:35 am

    James,

    I think the pressure for staff to be 100% utilized also leads to burnout, which leads to other problems. 100% utilized seems unreasonable from several angles. I like your list of things that happen when they are under-utilized.

    Annette :-)

    Reply
  2. Josh Dragon says

    26 April, 2015 at 4:29 pm

    As a middle manager, I have noticed that I am tempted to pressure my staff to be 100% utilized because then I don’t have to really analyze if my unit is succeeding. If every one is running around super busy, that must mean we really are super busy and succeeding. In actuality, it might be the exact opposite. Just because my staff is really busy, does not mean we are operating efficiently or effectively.

    Great post! Thanks for the insight.

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      3 May, 2015 at 8:32 pm

      Thanks Josh, maybe aiming for 100% is just lazy management, you don’t have to think too hard

      Reply
  3. Adrian Swinscoe says

    28 April, 2015 at 2:50 pm

    Hi James,
    I understand the idea behind ‘scheduling your staff at 100% is foolish beyond belief. Putting 10 or 20% slack in the system is a far more sensible approach.’

    How do you deal with variances in capability/skills?

    Adrian

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      3 May, 2015 at 8:33 pm

      Maybe you could use some of the slack time to bring everybody up to speed. Lots to be said for a little coaching and development time.

      Reply
  4. maz iqbal says

    11 May, 2015 at 1:01 pm

    Hello James,

    It occurs to me that you have identified the challenge: creating space for intelligent business practices to show up in the workplace. Not sure, that you suggestion is workable for many who find themselves in management positions. The organisational world is run to the same logic – that of efficiency, utilisation, and productivity of a particular silo over the short term. So a manager can move from one organisation to another, and when he gets there he finds himself enmeshed and ‘slave’ to the same organisational logic. Interestingly, this is also the root cause of customers sticking with existing (poor) suppliers rather than switching – despite what these customers say in surveys or social media.

    All the best
    maz

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Regression to The Mean

  • Should You Punish Mistakes?

  • The Alpha Male Paradox

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in