The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

Why Stereotyping Makes Issues Look Like a Wolves

15 March, 2012 by James Lawther 3 Comments

Your brain is amazing

It has a rekmabrale kanck of tainkg in ltos of infotmraion, sitfing it and cnretaig mennaig from it.  It deos this by mtahcing pttaerns, lokoing for comnomality with tnihgs that it has seen in the psat, and tehn finlig taht infotmarion away.  That is why you are albe to mkae ssene of this pragaaprh, eevn tgouhh it is gibsberih

The ability to quickly match patterns and draw conclusions is hugely important for our survival.  If it has four legs, is running towards you and it looks a bit like a wolf, then it is best to worry about whether or not it really is a wolf from a vantage point high up in a tree, rather than hanging about to be absolutely sure

There is a flip side though

The older we get, the more we have “seen it before” the more we are convinced by our pattern matching and the more we stereotype

And the more we stereotype and continue to see the world through the same glasses the harder it becomes to think outside the box, it is, after all, a box of our own creation, and a very comfortable box at that

Unfortunately, if we always see problems (or wolves) the same way we will never come up with any new ways of dealing with them

Try another perspective

The next time a wolf is bearing down on you, hard as it is, (and it will be) you should look at it from another perspective, you may well come up with an innovative way of dealing with it

Unless of course it is howling, in which case you can always retire to the top of the tree.  I will be there waiting

StereotypeRead another opinion

Image by fireflythegreat

Filed Under: Blog, Operations Analysis Tagged With: innovation, problem solving, stereotype

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. Adrian Swinscoe says

    17 March, 2012 at 12:30 pm

    Hi James,
    You point to an existential problem that we all face. One way I heard of dealing with that from a friend, Crispin Reid at Brandhouse, is to use ‘lateral experts’ from time to get a different perspectives from time to time, to get a completely fresh view of your situation.

    Do you use that in your organisation or have you seen it applied in other orgs?

    Adrian

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      17 March, 2012 at 9:13 pm

      Now there is a thought. The problem most organisations is that they hire in their own likeness, difficult to work for a bank unless you have previously worked for a bank, difficult to work in automotive unless you have previously worked in automotive.

      Lateral experts are few and far between. Thanks for the idea

      JL

      Reply
  2. maz iqbal says

    17 March, 2012 at 9:13 pm

    Hello James

    You have pointed out the trap – that is the good news. The not so good news is that it is not at all easy to escape from this trap. In essence you are asking the devil to police the devil! Not likely.

    Zen Buddhism deals with this through the practice of humility – so that you do not take yourself, your views, your desires so seriously. It also deals with it through cultivating compassion – that allows you to seek, hear, see the perspectives of others.

    Adrian makes a good point: make it a practice to get outsiders to provide their point of view. I’d go further and say invite the person/s who you know take a very different view from you on the issue at hand. That is really not that hard to do. The access to doing this is being present to an operating from the context that at best your gut feeling /. point of view is no better than a toss of the coin. Better still assume that the point of view that you are most attached to is the one that is most likely to be incomplete, misleading and possibily downright mistaken.

    With my love
    Maz

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Circles of Influence: Do You Want Your Team Flexing Their’s?

  • Should You Punish Mistakes?

  • Why Would You Want to Work for Google?

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in