The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

What Happened to Sears Quality and Service?

15 November, 2011 by Jim Reardan 1 Comment

As a Baby Boomer, I grew up in a generation where the Sears brand name stood for quality, integrity, reliability, and superior customer service.  Among the many products Sears sold, its Kenmore appliances have long enjoyed a solid reputation.  I remember how happy my Mom was the day my Dad bought her her first Kenmore washer and dryer.  That washer lasted more than 25 years.  And the Kenmore they replaced it with outlived Mom.

Not only did Sears sell one of the most reliable appliance brands, they were backed by Sears’ customer service organization.   It too had an unblemished reputation for fast, friendly response and quality work.  Dad used to say, “I wish Sears could work on my arthritis.”

If you called Sears in the morning, a serviceman usually showed up the same day.  And if a part was needed, the serviceman almost always had it on his truck – so he could fix it right then and there.

A few months ago, my daughter Jenni was bought a Kenmore washer-dryer set.  At only six weeks old, the washer quit.  Jenni called Sears customer service department.   The heavily-accented service person who answered her call tersely told her it would be eight days before a “technician” would be able to show up.  And when he did, he would likely bring a replacement washer.  At one time, a replacement might have been seen as a windfall.  Not now.  Sears doesn’t sell quality anymore.   Sears sells disposable appliances.

Over time Sears lost its focus on quality.  Instead, its marketing message is primarily focused on low prices and wide selection.

It’s obvious that Sears’ senior leadership is ignorant about the value of a market position based on recognized manufacturing quality and exceptional customer service.  Instead, Sears wants to compete in the crowded and unending war of low price and cost-cutting, where long-term domination is next to impossible.  Other than Wal-Mart, how many profitable companies can you think of that dominate their market by always selling at the lowest price?

The only hope for Sears is to go back to fighting in the quality and service arena – where few opponents appear to be.   But I doubt Sears will.  And I don’t know why so few companies dare to try.

All I know is that there appear to be far more many companies that die over low price and cost-cutting than do on the quality and service battlefield.  It’s too bad one of the USA’s most iconic and historic brands is likely to fall victim as well.

Washing Machine Battlefield

Read another opinion

Image by yeowatzup

This is a guest post by Jim Reardan. Visit his web site http://www.process1st.com/ to learn more.  If you would like to guest post on this site, read the guidelines here.

Filed Under: Blog, Employee Engagement Tagged With: customer focus, service differentiation, strategy

About the Author

Jim Reardan
Jim Reardan

Jim Reardan is a writer, keynote speaker, and Managing Principal Consultant with Process1st Consulting, LLC, a management consulting firm laser-focused on Business Process Management and Organizational Performance Improvement.

Jim has over 30 years of experience in Business Process Improvement in Sales, Marketing, Operations, IT Service Management, and Information Technology systems development and implementation.

For more information visit his personal blog www.BPIJournal.com, or contact Jim at 303-350-9047 or via the e-mail and website links below.

www.process1st.com/

Comments

  1. Kyle Thill says

    15 November, 2011 at 12:40 pm

    You think K-Mart had anything to do with it. Talk about two opposing sides of the merchandise stream coming together.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Should You Punish Mistakes?

  • Regression to The Mean

  • Best-of-Breed

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in