The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

Short Breaks Will Kill You

21 May, 2019 by James Lawther Leave a Comment

Quantitative or Qualitative Analysis?

An apocryphal tale…

A statistician working for a large organisation was asked to explain why sick pay was increasing.  The business had an ageing workforce and sickness levels were rising.  He gathered lots of data on lots of things:

  • Working patterns
  • Demographics
  • Employment related illnesses
  • Commuting times
  • Office locations… 

The list went on and on.  Like all good statisticians he liked data. 

Once he had the data he started to analyse it, looking for patterns, trying to extract the signal from the noise.  He ran single factor investigations, multivariate regressions, random forests and clustering algorithms… If he had the data and the computing power he ran the analysis, leaving no stone unturned.  

Eventually he came across a startling relationship.  The more breaks an employee had during the day the more likely they were to be sick and have long periods off work later in their career.  The statistics were compelling and completely against the conventional wisdom  that short regular breaks reduce stress and improve productivity. 

The statistician produced graphs. He presented powerpoint packs. He enlisted executive sponsorship. He was unstoppable. A new H.R. policy was written and prepared for launch.  Work breaks would be minimised during the day.  It was a win win.  Not only would this improve productivity, it would also improve employee health and wellness.

The policy was about to be launched when an occupational nurse pointed out a small flaw in the analysis.  She had spent her career talking to sick members of staff and was convinced that short breaks were a good thing for concentration and wellbeing.  Provided of course you didn’t use them to nip outside for a smoke.

The breaks weren’t making staff sick.  The cigarettes were.

Two types of analysis

1. Quantitative analysis

The sort of research beloved by the numerate and management consultants.  It is hard and fact based, requires lots of data and will point you in the right direction.  If you have the data, you can do all the analysis you want from the safety of your office.

Best of all, quantitative analysis looks beautifully strategic.  It will produce lots of charts that lull people in boardrooms into a sense of knowing what is going on.

Unfortunately quantitative analysis is wide and shallow.  Quantitative analysis will tell you where to look, but it won’t tell you what is going on.

2. Qualitative analysis

The sort of research beloved by humanities students and people who wear brown sandals.  It is soft and observation based.  To carry out qualitative research you have to leave the comfort of your office and talk to people and watch what they do.  Qualitative research is expensive and takes time.  It is easy to dismiss because it isn’t statistically valid and doesn’t show you anything like the whole picture.

Qualitative analysis is deep but narrow, but it is the best way to really understand what is going on, assuming you are looking in the right place.

Which is the more powerful?

Quantitative analysis will tell you that there is a relationship between short breaks and early deaths.  Qualitative analysis will tell you that it is the cigarettes, not the breaks, that are killing your workforce.

If you want to understand what is going on you need to do both. Worth remembering next time somebody sparkly is wowing you with their beautiful charts.

If you enjoyed this post click here to receive the next

Read another opinion

Photo by Austin Distel on Unsplash

Filed Under: Blog, Operations Analysis Tagged With: gemba, insight, learning, quantitative or qualitative, root cause analysis

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Regression to The Mean

  • Glory Lasts Forever

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Brilliance Alone Won’t Take You Far

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in