The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

The Two Faces of Accountability

1 January, 2018 by James Lawther 7 Comments

Accountability

When things go wrong there is a simple solution. Politicians do it, journalists do it, managers do it and even my children do it.   When things go wrong we search for somebody to blame “hold accountable”.  It’s in our nature.

Fortunately it is more nuanced than that. There are two ways we can hold others accountable:

Backward-looking accountability

Backward-looking accountability asks who is at fault? It searches through the facts to find out who caused the issue.  Then it allocates an appropriate punishment.  At its best, backward-looking accountability is fair and impartial.  It uses evidence to apportion blame.

Backward-looking accountability punishes the guilty to prevent reoccurrence.

Forward-looking accountability

Forward-looking accountability asks who will fix it? Like backward-looking accountability it searches through the facts, but focuses on “what happened?” not “who caused it?”  Then it finds somebody to make sure that plans and actions are put in place to resolve the problem.

Forward-looking accountability builds solutions that prevent reoccurrence.

Which type of accountability is the best type of accountability?

Well it all depends…

Looking backward:

Judges are tasked with backward-looking accountability.  A just legal system is an invaluable thing.  If people weren’t punished for wrong doing then society would quickly fall apart.

But “who is to blame?” and “who can I blame?” are two very different questions. If we use backward-looking accountability to find scape goats then people will run for cover. They will keep their mouths shut and hide their mistakes.  If there aren’t any mistakes then there can’t be any learning.

Looking forward:

Airline crash investigators are far more interested in forward-looking accountability. Understanding what caused a crash and stopping it from happening again is far more valuable to society than laying the blame.  Forward-looking accountability is synonymous with learning.  It needs people to be open and honest about issues.

But too much forward-looking accountability results in frustration and unrest if “the guilty” walk free.

What should the balance be?

I once worked for a man who professed to love the word accountability.  He was at his most energised when something went wrong and he could apportion accountability for the issue.

Would you like to work for this man?

I suspect that your gut reaction to that question tells you all you need to know about the balance of accountability in your own organisation.

If you enjoyed this post click here to receive the next

Read another opinion

Image by Arvid Rudling

Filed Under: Blog, Employee Engagement Tagged With: accountability, blame, learning, management style, reinforcing behaviour, root cause analysis

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. Simon Tasker says

    1 January, 2018 at 6:36 pm

    Interesting article James. I see evidence of accountability becoming confused with responsibility, with people less comfortable adopting the former. Successful outcomes always seem to get more people wanting a slice of the action, rather than when it goes wrong…..

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      2 January, 2018 at 10:42 am

      I guess there is a big difference between taking accountability for something and being made accountable for it…

      Reply
  2. Martin Andrew says

    2 January, 2018 at 2:15 am

    An interesting take on root cause analysis and preventive action. Thanks for more good thoughts

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      2 January, 2018 at 10:43 am

      Thank you, glad you liked it. Happy new year

      Reply
  3. Anish Hindocha says

    2 January, 2018 at 11:06 pm

    Terrific article James. Am currently reading ‘Black Box Thinking’ by Matthew Syed. His straight talking book gets into this subject brilliantly.

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      3 January, 2018 at 10:40 am

      Thank you Anish. On a similar vein it is also worth having a look at “Just Culture” by Sidney Dekker. A bit harder to read but it takes a slightly different slant.

      Reply
  4. Steve says

    14 January, 2018 at 11:05 am

    I see some fundamental flaws here.

    Forward or backward are both useful in creating sustainable solutions but the focus on who, rather than what, generates fingerpointing in either cases.

    Forward thinking without backward thinking will tend to generate superficial solutions.

    To summarise, the direction of viewpoint is far less important compared to what you look at.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Regression to The Mean

  • Glory Lasts Forever

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Brilliance Alone Won’t Take You Far

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in