The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

Prove Me Wrong!

15 August, 2016 by James Lawther 1 Comment

Confirmation bias

A scientist has asked you to take part in a test.  It is a simple test, all you have to do is work out a pattern of numbers.

He gives you three numbers to start with and then asks you to give him another set of three numbers.  In return he will let you know if they follow the pattern or not.

The first three numbers are:

2, 4, 6

The answer is obvious.  Most of us (even me) would guess:

8, 10, 12

The experimenter confirms that the guess follows the pattern.  Then he asks for another set of three numbers.  How about:

14, 16, 18

The experimenter confirms that yet again the guess follows the pattern.  He asks if you would like another guess to check your understanding of the pattern.  Or perhaps you are happy that you have figured out what the pattern is?

If you are anything like me, you have worked out the pattern.  This game is getting boring.  You’d be happy to make a fair-sized bet that the pattern is sequential even numbers.

And you would be flat-out wrong

What do you believe?

What the experiment shows is that we search for confirmation of what we believe to be true. If we get that confirmation then we believe it to be even more truer than we did before (dreadful English).

Once we have confirmed our belief we stop asking questions.  After all we know the answer.  We move on to something else.

A few more numbers:

What if I tell you that both: 10, 108, 804 and 1, 2, 3 follow the pattern?

Or that neither of the sequences: 1.5, 2.5, 3.5 nor 3, 2, 1 do?

What do you think the pattern is now?

In the interests of sanity the pattern is increasing whole numbers.

You only learn when you get it wrong

Repeated guesses that confirm what we already know don’t help us.  The only way to understand the pattern is to start making predictions in the hope of getting them wrong.  Predictions that invalidate our beliefs instead of reinforcing them.

Paul H Schoemaker tried this test out on college students. He discovered that only 10% of students worked out the right answer.  Even when they could make as many predictions as they wanted.

The pattern is rarely uncovered unless subjects are willing to make mistakes – that is to test numbers that violate their beliefs. Instead, most people get stuck in a narrow and wrong hypothesis.

So the next time you try something new, make sure to include some things you don’t think will work. Who knows what you will find?

If you enjoyed this post click here to have the next sent straight to your inbox

Patterns in numbers

Read another opinion

Image by duncan c

Filed Under: Blog, Operations Analysis Tagged With: assumptions, beliefs, confirmation bias, human nature, learning, test and learn

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. Annette Franz says

    16 August, 2016 at 2:58 am

    James,

    We hate to think outside our comfort zones. But only when we step outside that zone can we learn and innovate.

    Annette :-)

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Regression to The Mean

  • Brilliance Alone Won’t Take You Far

  • Glory Lasts Forever

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in