The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

Glory Lasts Forever

9 May, 2015 by James Lawther 7 Comments

I have a problem with motivational speeches

I watched “The Replacements” last night.  I can’t urge you strongly enough to avoid it.  The plot went something like this (and I am not spoiling it, the director did that).

  1. Shane Falco (Keanu Reeves) flunks it as an Ohio State University quarterback.
  2. A national team “The Washington Sentinels” go on strike – US Football players don’t get paid enough
  3. Keanu and a bunch of “Replacement” failed players are hired in a last-ditch effort to save the team.
  4. They have to win 3 of the 4 last games of the season to get into the playoffs.
  5. Needless to say, they lose the first game, win the second two and it all hangs – about as subtly as the Clifton Suspension Bridge – on the last game.

Then came the good bit

In the last game they are being whipped 17-0 when Keanu is substituted onto the pitch and gives this fabulous pep talk:

I know you’re tired

I know you’re hurting

I wish I could say something classy and inspirational but that just wouldn’t be our style

Pain heals

Chicks dig scars

Glory lasts forever

It was one of only two bits of the whole film that were worth watching.

Of course, they go on and win and Brooke Langton (the only other reason to watch the film, and then only if you are a middle-aged man who should know better) goes on to dig Keanu’s scars.

Getting to the point

We love a good motivational speech:

  • Bill Pullman does a fabulous job in Independence Day, then kills some aliens
  • Russell Crowe rouses the troops in Gladiator then unleashes hell
  • Mel Gibson’s William Wallace does such a good job of slagging off the English I nearly bought a kilt

But do motivational speeches really work?

Do pep talks, posters, slogans and conferences drive performance?

Or does glory on the sports field (or battlefield or maybe in an office) come down to all the hard work of; practicing, weightlifting, teamwork, eating well, coaching, running the scenarios, sports psychology…

Did the rhetoric win the match or was it the system?

Mind you, the thrill of watching Keanu’s nutritionist, psychologist, personal trainer and boot cleaner would have just made a bad film worse.

If you enjoyed this post click here to have the next delivered straight to your inbox

Read another opinion

Image by Nottingham Trent University

Filed Under: Blog, Employee Engagement Tagged With: communication, motivation, rhetoric, systems thinking, video

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. Annette Franz says

    11 May, 2015 at 5:57 am

    James,

    I suppose different people are motivated differently. Perhaps we should understand that first before we assume we know what motivates them.

    Annette :-)

    Reply
  2. Marie Montoya says

    11 May, 2015 at 7:51 am

    James
    Nice post – Motivational words work in the right situation – but the foundation has to be in place with a decent system and knowledge base.

    Ri
    x

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      19 May, 2015 at 8:25 pm

      Thank you Ri, glad you liked it

      Reply
  3. maz iqbal says

    11 May, 2015 at 12:49 pm

    Hello James,
    You ask a pertinent question. Here is my take on the question:

    1. Skill / expertise is necessary but not sufficient;
    2. Resources are necessary but not sufficient;
    3. Hunger (some call this motivation) is necessary but not sufficient;

    So where does this leave us? I say that achievement is function of a number of variables and can be spelled out as follows:

    Achievement = f (hunger, skill, resources, timing, luck).

    It also occurs to me that man has consistently achieved incredible outcomes by lusting for glory. And riches.

    I wish you a great day.

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      19 May, 2015 at 8:24 pm

      Thought provoking as ever Maz, thanks for the comment

      Reply
  4. Adrian Swinscoe says

    12 May, 2015 at 3:59 pm

    James,

    I remember listening to a very honest but very insightful personal development speaker once that said that people leave events or listen to talks or read motivational posters and get all pumped up. It can fuel their performance for a short time. Adrenaline dissipates fast and so it is discipline and commitment that seems to drive us on.

    So, you ask: Do pep talks, posters, slogans and conferences drive performance? Not really. They can kick-start things but they don’t sustain it. That takes something else.

    Adrian

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      19 May, 2015 at 8:25 pm

      Nicely put Adrian

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Glory Lasts Forever

  • Regression to The Mean

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Should You Punish Mistakes?

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in