The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

The Minimalist

3 April, 2014 by James Lawther 13 Comments

It does just what it says on the tin

Have you noticed that the simplest things are often the best?

  • Diamond earrings
  • One line gags
  • A stop sign
  • Pencil drawings
  • A wind up alarm clock
  • Walking on the beach

We love simple things, we love things that “do just what it says on the tin”.  Nothing more, nothing less.

So why make things complicated?

If you can distill your work down to its bare minimum it will be clearer, have more impact, cost less, work better and will be far, far, far less likely to go wrong.

Something to think about next time you:

  • Write to a customer
  • Create a work instruction
  • Develop a process
  • Pull together a PowerPoint presentation

Improvement is often about what you take out

Not what you put in, but don’t over do it… fish is nothing without chips (and mushy peas).

If you enjoyed this post click here for updates delivered straight to your inbox.

Simplicity

Read another opinion

Image by EEPaul

Filed Under: Blog, Process Improvement Tagged With: simplicity

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. Adrian Swinscoe says

    5 April, 2014 at 2:06 pm

    James,
    Don’t agree with you on the mushy peas, I’m afraid. But, I’m completely with you on the quest for simplicity or eliminating unnecessary things.

    However, making something more simple, more clear, more concise etc etc tends to require more time, more effort, more thinking. Maybe, most of us are too lazy to do simple? Or, are not given the time or the resources to do simple.

    Adrian

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      9 April, 2014 at 9:03 pm

      I agree (not about the mushy peas, food of the gods).

      But as an old boss once said to me why do we never have time to do it right but always have time to do it again?

      Reply
      • Adrian Swinscoe says

        11 April, 2014 at 7:32 am

        An anomaly of human nature?

        Reply
        • James Lawther says

          15 April, 2014 at 8:19 am

          What, the bit about mushy peas?

          Reply
  2. Annette Franz says

    5 April, 2014 at 10:40 pm

    James,

    Have you read Matthew May’s Laws of Subtraction? He would enjoy this post.

    “Less is more” is my new motto. It is hard to do, though. Perhaps it’s from learning as children to “give it your all?”

    Annette :-)

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      9 April, 2014 at 9:01 pm

      I have, a very good book indeed.

      Reply
  3. maz iqbal says

    6 April, 2014 at 10:21 pm

    Hello James,

    You write “if you can distill your work down to its bare minimum it will be clearer, have more impact, cost less, work better and will be far, far, far less likely to go wrong.” And the following thoughts arise for me:

    1. Who has the time to actually think about what is so and distill it down to its essence – the bare minimum in your word? Really, who has the time? I find nobody has the time not even the Tops. Everybody is busy spinning his/her/their particular plates.

    2. Who is actually paid to design-do work that has more impact, cost less and works better? People like you show up as dangerous. Do you not get that you are preaching revolution? The good soldier obeys orders, follows the script, fulfils the job description, and above all does not rock the boat by questioning how things are done.

    All the best
    maz

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      9 April, 2014 at 9:04 pm

      Sooner or later I will get the sack Maz, it is only a question of time.

      Reply
  4. Steven Borris says

    15 April, 2014 at 8:34 am

    I have found that often procedures and articles have been written to make the writer look intelligent and not to make the process easier for the user.

    I have found the same at interviews, where the questions have clearly not been intended for me but for the others on the panel.

    We should never need to read the instructions repeatedly just to understand them…

    The same holds true for any parts to be assembled or processes to be followed: simple is best.

    Even science has a beauty in simplicity – look at Einstein’s equation E=mc2.

    When we get something right, we usually wonder why we used to find it so hard.

    Steve

    Reply
  5. Brad Snyder says

    17 April, 2014 at 6:04 am

    EVERYTHING SHOULD BE MADE AS SIMPLE AS POSSIBLE, BUT NOT SIMPLER—ALBERT EINSTEIN

    There is beauty in simplicity… but not everything is simple… to make the attempt to simplify beyond reason is to risk misunderstanding of the subject… just look at today’s dangerous “junk science”

    Reply
  6. Catherine Roynette says

    17 April, 2014 at 7:10 pm

    I completely agree with all the above, I believe that companies should now start to invest employee time for creative thinking (is it Google that has 20% time for this?). Employees in sensitive posts where a new strategy is needed to streamline the business should be encouraged to take time to “think outside the box”, contribute to bridging the gap between “as is” + job experience … and … new objectives for improvement!

    “Simple” might cost companies employee time, but the return on investments should not be overlooked!

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      27 April, 2014 at 6:02 am

      Thanks for your thoughts Catherine, I agree wholeheartedly about the 20% idea

      James

      Reply
  7. Robert Symonds says

    20 April, 2014 at 10:12 am

    Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius — and a lot of courage — to move in the opposite direction

    – Albert Eistein

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Should You Punish Mistakes?

  • Circles of Influence: Do You Want Your Team Flexing Their’s?

  • Sex and Soap Powder, Trial and Error

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in