The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

Top 10 Process Mapping Sins

12 June, 2010 by James Lawther 1 Comment

  1. Not being clear on the scope: how will you know when to stop?
  2. Not gaining buy in: whose back yard are you digging in?
  3. Not explaining what you are doing: at best staff will be suspicious, at worst they will turn nasty. (Positioning your work as a cost saving initiative is not going to help you, not even slightly.)
  4. Relying on the manager: if he knew what was going on you wouldn’t be mapping it.
  5. Not talking to the workers: it is only the people who work on the process who really understand how the process works.
  6. Only looking at one department:  people in other departments may well be too busy to get involved because it doesn’t involve them.  Well it does.
  7. Forgetting the time: time is integral to the process, it is the expensive bit.
  8. Using lots of complicated technically correct symbols: nobody understands them, and if they do they probably need to get a girl friend.
  9. Drawing up your own conclusions: it is all too easy to jump to conclusions.
  10. Not doing anything with the output: process maps are no use in folders.

Image by alto maltes

Filed Under: Blog, Process Improvement, Tools & Techniques Tagged With: back to the floor, gemba, jargon, process mapping

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. Michael Thompson says

    17 August, 2011 at 6:55 am

    I think you are right about managers, workers and conclusions.

    Knave sat in numerous process mapping sessions where the manager has sat and argued violently with the people who run the process. There is a massive difference between what should happen and what does happen.

    The truth gets warped even more violently if there is an auditor in the room

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Should You Punish Mistakes?

  • Sex and Soap Powder, Trial and Error

  • The Alpha Male Paradox

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in