The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

The Productivity Equation

7 December, 2014 by James Lawther 4 Comments

We all want more productivity…

The world abounds with productivity experts of one sort or another:

  • Outsource this
  • Streamline that
  • Squeeze the other

We obsess about reducing our cost base. Taking out heads and slashing expense. But we are missing a trick?

How do you define productivity?

Using a little advanced algebra (if I say so myself), I came up with this:
Productivity = output / Resources

Or maybe this…

Productivity = Value / Cost

When you look at it like that there are two ways to improve productivity.

  1. The way we all focus on, reducing our cost base
  2. The other way, increasing the value we provide

Both are equally valid but the second way has a couple of things going for it…

Thing 1:

It is a lot easier to engage your staff in increasing the value they offer. That is something they can get excited about. Trying to persuade them that outsourcing is a good thing is a different kettle of fish altogether.

Thing 2:

Is a quote from the richest man I ever met.

You don’t save yourself rich ~ John Mars

How do you approach the productivity problem?

Should you accentuate the positive or minimise the negative?

If you enjoyed this post click here to have the next delivered straight to your inbox

Image by Incourage Community Foundation

Read another opinion

Filed Under: Blog, Process Improvement Tagged With: cost saving, office productivity, video

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. Annette Franz says

    8 December, 2014 at 4:33 am

    James,

    I’m wondering if it’s not an “and” instead of an “or”… increased output and increased value?

    Annette :-)

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      13 December, 2014 at 10:14 pm

      This is called wanting to have your cake and eat it. Though you may have a point.

      Reply
  2. maz iqbal says

    8 December, 2014 at 1:28 pm

    Hello James,
    I get what you are getting at. Which is the reason that I left behind my productivity (almost always cost cutting and dumb automation) days. And moved into demand (revenue generation) back in 1999. Haven’t regretted a day of it.

    I found that the productivity focus and folks (cost cutting and automation work and folks) eventually wore me down. Life become lifeless – the adventure-joy was just sucked out.

    The interesting thing, for me, is that the demand side is more challenging, more fun, more rewarding for me. And so I have not regretted a single day of my move. It occurs to me that a company does not make its way to greatness simply by focussing on productivity.

    Furthermore, if you show up and travel from a big enough context, one that meets people’s deepest needs-aspiration, usually along the lines of paying them well and being about creating a better world, productivity and cost control take care of themselves.

    All the best
    maz

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      13 December, 2014 at 10:15 pm

      An interesting but heretical thought Maz

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Should You Punish Mistakes?

  • Glory Lasts Forever

  • Regression to The Mean

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in