The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

Counting Mushy Peas

10 January, 2014 by James Lawther 5 Comments

Operational definition

In the movie East is East there is a great line

Crude…

But great…

And what d’you think I do in there morning till night?

Counting mushy fuckin’ peas?

Can you think of anything more futile than counting mushy peas?

In his book The Tiger That Isn’t (which is also great) Andrew Dilnot picks up on the idea.

N.B. If you aren’t from the UK and don’t know what a mushy pea is, then you are gastronomically bereft and should watch this video.  Be warned they are so good we have non left to export.

When is a mushy pea a mushy pea?

How on earth would you define one?

  • Is it a certain size?
  • Does it have to be a particular shade of green?
  • What proportion of a whole pea should it be?
  • What about the shape?
  • Or sloppiness?
  • Or texture?

When is a mushy pea a mushy pea?

It isn’t just mushy peas that are hard to define

Our operations are full of ambiguity, and that gives us a problem. Can you manage what you can’t define or measure?

  • When is a patient a patient?
  • When is a fraud a fraud?
  • When does a customer start to wait?
  • When does a query become a complaint?
  • And when does an issue become an emergency?

Here is the little secret

It doesn’t matter that much so long as you broadly right…

  1. Create an operational definition, an all-encompassing one (don’t exclude things)
  2. Stick with it and don’t change it

You can spend your life arguing about definitions and measuring and remeasuring until you get an answer you like, or you can do something to improve the situation.

How do you want to spend your time?

It is better to be approximately right than precisely wrong ~ Anon

If you enjoyed this post click here for updates delivered to your inbox

Mushy Peas

Read another opinion

Image by Leach84

Share
Share on LinkedIn
Share
Share this

Filed Under: Blog, Operations Analysis, Tools & Techniques Tagged With: measurement, operational definition

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. Annette Franz says

    12 January, 2014 at 7:46 am

    James,

    I love the title… and the analogy! (And the video was quite educational. :-)) The only thing I would add is that, once it’s defined, make sure it’s communicated so that everyone is on the same page.

    Annette :-)

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      13 January, 2014 at 6:34 am

      Absolutely, there is little point defining something if people don’t agree

      Glad you enjoyed the video.

      Reply
  2. Adrian Swinscoe says

    12 January, 2014 at 2:03 pm

    James,
    I’m completely with you on advocating less talk about stuff on the margin and more coordinated action about improving a given and agreed situation.

    Adrian

    Reply
  3. maz iqbal says

    18 January, 2014 at 11:05 am

    Hello James

    I’d add that all definitions arise out of our desire for clarity-predictability-order-control. Whereas life, including organisational life, is messy-fuzzy-squiggly rather like the mushy peas. So the phenomena itself is squiggly and we make it a square. That is ok as long as we keep in existence the awareness that we have performed magic, an illusion, in converting a squiggle into a square. The issue is that we rapidly forget the sorcery that we have done. And we go about the world, especially organisational life, convinced that ‘that which is’ is really a square.

    Which is my way of saying, no matter how square you make reality remember that reality is and always be a squiggle: mushy pea like.

    All the best
    maz

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      21 January, 2014 at 7:08 am

      Interesting perspective Maz, I agree, but I am not sure how many people will like it

      James

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • How to Turn a Supertanker

  • 4 Ways to Solve a Problem

  • The Stop Button

  • Glory Lasts Forever

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in