The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

Mistakes on Death Row

1 October, 2013 by James Lawther 7 Comments

Yesterday I read about a man who had been falsely convicted of murder.  Damon Thibodeaux walked free after spending 15 years on death row in Louisiana State Penitentiary.

Now he is going to spend his time “concentrating on putting my life back together and moving forward”.  Can you imagine?

Damon is the 18th person to be released from death row in the US on the back of DNA evidence, and the American Civil Liberties Union is getting vocal about it.

If we can’t figure out how to have a death penalty that doesn’t put innocent men on death row, and innocent women on death row across the country, then we don’t deserve to have it. It’s a human rights violation

No doubt they are right to get angsty.  But false imprisonment is only half the problem.

It is far worse than that…

Not only was Damon imprisoned for 15 years, the real murderer is still at large.  Two horrible mistakes

  • One man imprisoned for a crime he didn’t commit
  • One man walking free for a crime he did

Two types of error, false positive and false negative.

Double trouble.  And there is the problem…

It is easy to fix one problem

  • It is easy to make sure no criminals walk free. Arrest everybody.
  • It is easy to make sure nobody is wrongly convicted.  Arrest nobody.

Fixing one problem is never too difficult, but fixing two problems puts you in a different league.

So next time you are cracking down on…

  • Fraudulent transactions
  • Long appointment times
  • Inappropriate internet use

Remember the twin error.  It is every bit as nasty.

If you enjoyed this post click here to have them delivered straight to your inbox

Death Row

Image by Julian Stallabrass

Read another opinion

Filed Under: Blog, Operations Analysis, Tools & Techniques Tagged With: cost of poor quality, error proofing, false positive and negative, risk assessment, six sigma

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. Bob Corrick says

    3 October, 2013 at 9:02 pm

    Uncommon good sense. Thank you.

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      3 October, 2013 at 9:13 pm

      Glad you thought so Bob. Thank you

      Reply
  2. Adrian Swinscoe says

    5 October, 2013 at 11:56 am

    Great point showing that the obvious problem is not the only problem. Thanks for that, James.

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      13 October, 2013 at 7:14 pm

      My pleasure, glad you liked it

      Reply
  3. maz iqbal says

    5 October, 2013 at 12:14 pm

    Hello James,

    Beautifully put.

    It occurs to me that in this short post you have unconcealed and made present the messiness of reality: the multidimensional nature of existence including all interventions that we make in any living system.

    It also occurs to me that you have highlighted the issue with our management obsession with efficiency. The more one focuses on efficiency (above a certain threshold) the higher the likelihood that one or more dimensions of effectiveness are being undermined. Yet, by not keeping effectiveness present we are blind that efficiency is being undermined.

    maz

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      13 October, 2013 at 7:15 pm

      I hadn’t thought of it like that Maz, though I guess you are right. I suppose “efficiency” has multiple dimensions, most of which we are blind to.

      Reply
  4. Annette Franz says

    13 October, 2013 at 5:10 am

    Great point, James. If you fixed one problem, did you create another? Did you uncover another? Did you open a can of worms? As Adrian mentions, the obvious problem is not always the obvious problem.

    Annette :-)

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Circles of Influence: Do You Want Your Team Flexing Their’s?

  • Should You Punish Mistakes?

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Solutioneering

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in