The Squawk Point

Organisational Mechanics

  • Home
  • Blog
    • People
    • Data
    • Process
    • Wild Cards
    • Index
  • Podcast
  • Book

The French are More Generous than the British

18 September, 2013 by James Lawther 5 Comments

Here is a fascinating chart for you…  fascinating if you have a thing for charts.

Consent Rates

What the data shows is the consent rate for organ donation in different European countries.

It appears that the French are very generous.

If they are unfortunate enough to die an untimely death almost 100% of them have given their consent for their organs to be transplanted and used by others.

Less than 1 in 5 of the British are similarly big-hearted.

The French, no doubt, would say that this is a cultural phenomenon, the British are known for their miserable ways.  (They have a point, we are miserable, primarily because of the weather.)

But cultural differences don’t explain it

If they did why would the Germans and Austrians show such a huge difference? They seem to me to be very similar nationalities.  Or how about the Swedish and Danish?

There is something else coming into play…

And that something else is easy to explain.

Some countries opt-in to donation

In The UK, Germany, Denmark and Netherlands we have to tick a box explicitly stating that we are happy for our organs to be transplanted.  Very few of us get around to ticking it.

Some countries opt-out of donation

In the other countries it is implicitly assumed that you are happy to have your organs transplanted, unless you tick a box stating otherwise.  Very few of them get around to ticking it.

It is all about the tick box

The vast difference in generosity between nations has nothing to do with culture and everything to do with design.

Nobody is coerced; it has just been made easy for people to make the “right” decision.

So if you want your staff and customers to do the right thing…

Make it easy for them.

(How do you know what the “right thing” is?  There is a whole different story.)

If you enjoyed this post click here to have updates sent to you directly

 Tick Box

Read another opinion

Image by mitzpantic

Filed Under: Blog, Process Improvement Tagged With: default option, error proofing, service design

About the Author

James Lawther
James Lawther

James Lawther is a middle-aged, middle manager.

To reach this highly elevated position he has worked in numerous industries, from supermarket retailing to tax collecting.  He has had several operational roles, including running the night shift in a frozen pea packing factory and carrying out operational research for a credit card company.

As you can see from his C.V. he has either a wealth of experience or is incapable of holding down a job.  If the latter is true this post isn’t worth a minute of your attention.

Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to read it and decide for yourself.

www.squawkpoint.com/

Comments

  1. Adrian Swinscoe says

    22 September, 2013 at 10:08 am

    Hi James,
    Does this support the theory that we are, generally, lazy when it comes to decisions like this and systems need to be smarter to accommodate this?

    Adrian

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      25 September, 2013 at 7:19 am

      I think that you may well be right, though I guess somebody needs to be engaged enough to design the system.

      James

      Reply
  2. Annette Franz says

    26 September, 2013 at 5:24 am

    James,

    Great post. Is it about making it easy to do the right thing or making a decision for you? Assuming they know what you’ll want to do or making a decision for you?

    Either way, I agree with your point… if you want employees to do the right thing, make it easy for them.

    Annette :-)

    Reply
    • James Lawther says

      28 September, 2013 at 6:18 am

      Interesting question Annette. Should you make the decision for them, and how do you know it is the right one?

      I guess that one way or another “the default option” is making a decision, like it or not. So I believe we should be very careful what that “default option” is.

      James

      Reply
  3. maz iqbal says

    5 October, 2013 at 12:19 pm

    Hello James,

    Great point and well made. After 20+ years of experience spanning many organisations looking into all kinds of domains I can confidently assert that human organisations are not designed nor fit for purpose – at least not the one that is articulated. So starting with a specific purpose and designing the organisation to naturally, and by default, to deliver on that purpose would be a great start to generating breakthroughs in performance.

    Maz

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Explore

accountability assumptions beliefs best practice blame bureaucracy capability clarity command and control communication complexity continuous improvement cost saving culture customer focus data is not information decisions employee performance measures empowerment error proofing fessing up gemba human nature incentives information technology innovation key performance indicators learning management style measurement motivation performance management poor service process control purpose reinforcing behaviour service design silo management systems thinking targets teamwork test and learn trust video waste

Receive Posts by e-Mail

Get the next post delivered straight to your inbox

Creative Commons

This information from The Squawk Point is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons Licence
Customer Experience Update

Try This:

  • Fish Bone Diagrams – Helpful or Not?

  • Regression to The Mean

  • Glory Lasts Forever

  • Brilliance Alone Won’t Take You Far

Connect

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Contact Me

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in