We are getting grief at work, we aren’t dispatching van drivers quickly enough.
(The first bit of that statement is true, we are always getting grief at work, the second bit is made up to protect the innocent, but you will get the point).
My boss is jumping up and down about our dispatch rate (the time it takes to send a driver to a customer). We are hopeless; it takes us forever to send out a driver. It is a shambles.
There is a lot of noise
- The planners are to blame, their forecast is wrong
- The operation is to blame, their staff are incompetent
- IT are to blame, their system keeps failing
- Management Information are to blame, their data is all wrong
There is a lot of heat
But there is very little light
- As my daughter would say, nobody has a Scooby
- My boss is more forthright about the situation
I am sure you have experienced something similar. Why do bosses always wait until Friday afternoon before they lose their cool?
The man to solve the problem
The analyst is a sharp cookie, I am sure the answer will be in there somewhere, but I have to admit it isn’t obvious to a man of my limited intelligence or attention span.
Unfortunately my boss has an even shorter attention span than me (he is brighter than me as well, not a great combination). Hell will freeze over before I show him this, it will be a blood bath, mostly my blood. The presentation doesn’t answer his question.
So the analyst and I walked through the three rules of data presentation.
Rule 1: Tell me what you are telling me
“Easy” he says, “blindingly obvious. We don’t have enough drivers to cope with the volume of customers. When the volume is high we send drivers late. We have a plan to train some more drivers, that should solve the problem by the end of the year.”
At it’s simplest the story is…
- Driver shortages cause poor dispatch rates
- We plan to train more drivers and improve performance
At which point I wonder why he doesn’t tell me that on the slide (In a caring, sharing, coaching, sort of way).
A presentation is an exercise in communication. If done well I should grasp what is going on simply by looking at it. I shouldn’t have to guess what a slide is telling me. Or worse still jump to my own conclusions.
And the best place to tell me that story is in the title, preferably in big letters so it gets through my thick skull.
Writing down what the message is:
- Makes the writer think
- Stops the reader having to
Write out a clear story in bullets and use those as the titles for the slides.
Rule 2: Only tell me one thing at a time
It is true that squashing as much information as possible onto one piece of paper saves trees.
But in the days of digital projectors the argument has long gone. There are no extra marks for slide optimisation.
Each slide should be a single obvious idea. That way the reader (my boss) is less likely to get confused.
Put one idea on one slide.
Rule 3. Make sure the picture supports the story
Now for the last rule; the data on the slide should support the title.
If the title says that “Driver shortages result in low dispatch rates” and the supporting charts and data show the impact of snow and seasonality on your ability to get a van on the road plus the detail of a training plan, is it any wonder if your audience gets confused?
Charts and titles should match.
Now the slides look like this
The same numbers, just presented a little more clearly.
The problem with being clear
Unfortunately providing clear information does have a downside. Now my boss has a whole host of other questions
- Why didn’t we train the drivers earlier?
- Why will we only have a 90% dispatch rate?
- What else needs fixing?
But then, maybe that is progress and it keeps me employed.
P.S. The events depicted in this post are fictitious. Any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Especially my boss, who, for the record, is a lovely man and, more concerningly, has been known to read this.
Click here for updates delivered straight to your inbox
Read another opinion
Image by Roberto Trm